CeFi vs DeFi Earn in 2025: Which Is Better for Passive Income?

Side-by-side comparison of yields, risks, custody, UX, and the best places to start. Built for beginners and intermediate investors.

Overview: CeFi vs DeFi

CeFi (centralized services like Binance or Nexo) focuses on simplicity and steady rates. DeFi (on-chain protocols like Aave or Lido) offers transparency and flexible yields but requires more setup and self-custody.

Yields & Rate Dynamics

  • CeFi: steadier APY, occasional promos, potential caps and tiering.
  • DeFi: market-driven rates; can be higher but volatile and pool-dependent.

See also: What Is Yield Farming?

Risk & Custody

  • CeFi: counterparty/custodial risk, terms changes, withdrawal limits in stress.
  • DeFi: smart-contract, governance, oracle risks; you hold the keys.

User Experience & Effort

CeFi is plug-and-play (apps, fiat on-ramps, support). DeFi needs wallets, network fees, and basic on-chain literacy — in return, you keep control.

Platforms to Start

Mini Case Studies

  • CeFi stablecoin earn: simple UX, e.g. 6–8% APY with tiers; counterparty risk applies.
  • DeFi liquid staking (Lido): ~3–5% on ETH with liquid token (stETH) for flexibility; smart-contract risk.
  • Pendle boosted yields: higher potential (two-token mechanics), but more moving parts and strategy risk.

CeFi vs DeFi: Full Comparison

AspectCeFi EarnDeFi Yield
CustodyPlatform holds fundsYou hold keys
YieldsSteadier, often cappedVariable, potentially higher
RiskCounterparty, policySmart contracts, governance
UXBeginner-friendlyAdvanced (wallets, gas)
TransparencyLowerHigher (on-chain)
On/Off-rampEasy (fiat)External bridges/DEXes

FAQ

Which is safer?

Depends on your threat model. CeFi centralises risk; DeFi shifts risk to code and self-custody. Many users blend both.

Which earns more?

Often DeFi during active markets; CeFi during promos. Always assess sustainability.

← Back to Blog